Representative

Dan Crenshaw

Republican · U.S. House · TX · District 2

In office since Jan 3, 2019
$1,804,224
Itemized received
8,665
Contributions
579
Votes cast · 119th
0.491
Voting score · 310 of 450

Money covers itemized individual contributions over $200 in the FEC cycles currently loaded — not a career total, and not small-dollar or unitemized receipts. Votes and ideology cover the 119th Congress.

Who funds Dan Crenshaw

Largest itemized donors across their campaign committees
DonorLocationTotalGifts
Mafrige, DavidHouston, TX$19,8008
Oden, KeithHouston, TX$19,8008
Cusumano, CharlesBurbank, CA$14,0009
Taylor, MargarettaNew York, NY$13,2004
Mitzner, IraHouston, TX$13,2006
Oden, SandraHouston, TX$13,2004
Mafrige, LynnetteHouston, TX$13,2004
Doolittle, Marla MFairbanks, AK$11,90019
Faust, AnneNewtown Square, PA$10,4008
Bookout, JohnHouston, TX$10,0004
Holsclaw, RalphWoodland, CA$9,60012
Allred, DouglasSan Diego, CA$7,0508
Wong, Edward G. Mr.San Diego, CA$7,0007
Beckwith, NickPittsburgh, PA$6,8704
Bachmann, RichardHouston, TX$6,8704
Casillas, StuartDanville, CA$6,8704
Nath, CodySpring, TX$6,6002
Crow, Harlan R.Dallas, TX$6,6002
Walsh, DavidJackson, WY$6,6002
Rehnert, GeoffreyBoston, MA$6,6002
McAlister, Wade P.Houston, TX$6,6002
Arnold, JohnHouston, TX$6,6002
Faison, JayCharlotte, NC$6,6002
Crow, KatherineDallas, TX$6,6002
Loeb, DanielNew York, NY$6,6002

Campaign committees: Dan Crenshaw for Congress

Where the money comes from

Inside TX versus everywhere else
43%
From TX · $778,998
57%
From outside TX · $1,025,226

Share of itemized receipts by the contributor state on each filing. A filing with no state recorded counts as outside TX, so the in-state share is a floor rather than an estimate. Out-of-state giving is ordinary and lawful; it is reported here because it is part of the public record and is not otherwise easy to see.

How Dan Crenshaw votes

Most recent roll-call votes, 119th Congress

444 Yea · 135 Nay · 64 Not Voting · 10.0% missed

DateQuestionMeasureVoteResult
Jul 23, 2026On PassageHR8884YeaPassed (232–188)
Jul 23, 2026On Agreeing to the ResolutionHCONRES89NayPassed (214–208)
Jul 22, 2026On Agreeing to the ResolutionHCONRES113YeaPassed (216–214)
Jul 22, 2026On PassageHR7008YeaPassed (232–198)
Jul 22, 2026On Motion to RecommitHR7008NayFailed (211–218)
Jul 22, 2026On PassageHR8800YeaPassed (216–212)
Jul 22, 2026On Motion to RecommitHR8800NayFailed (213–216)
Jul 22, 2026On Agreeing to the AmendmentHR8800NayFailed (175–254)
Jul 22, 2026On Agreeing to the AmendmentHR8800Not VotingAgreed to (232–199)
Jul 22, 2026On Agreeing to the AmendmentHR8800YeaFailed (207–224)
Jul 22, 2026On Agreeing to the AmendmentHR8800YeaAgreed to (221–210)
Jul 21, 2026On PassageHR9770YeaPassed (220–205)
Jul 21, 2026On PassageHR6955YeaPassed (270–155)
Jul 21, 2026On Motion to RecommitHR6955NayFailed (210–216)
Jul 21, 2026On Agreeing to the AmendmentHR8800YeaFailed (214–216)

Voting position over time

Nokken-Poole first dimension, re-estimated each Congress
CongressScorePosition on the scale
119th0.491
118th0.507
117th0.447
116th0.397

Nokken-Poole scores are re-estimated for each Congress, so they can move as a member’s voting changes. They are derived from roll-call votes alone and say nothing about why a member voted as they did. Voteview, which publishes these scores, reads the first dimension as running from liberal at −1 to conservative at +1; DonorTrail reports the position and the rank, and leaves the label to the source.

Reading this page

What these records do and do not show

This page places two independent public records side by side: itemized campaign contributions reported to the Federal Election Commission, and roll-call votes published by the Clerk of the House and the Secretary of the Senate. DonorTrail does not assert that any contribution influenced any vote, and nothing here should be read as a claim of cause. Here is the record; the conclusions are yours to draw.

Elsewhere: Wikidata · Congressional Biographical Directory · OpenSecrets · Ballotpedia

Money figures computed Aug 19, 2026. How the data works · Report a correction