Representative

Shri Thanedar

Democrat · U.S. House · MI · District 13

In office since Jan 3, 2023
$2,247,819
Itemized received
948
Contributions
632
Votes cast · 119th
-0.358
Voting score · 138 of 450

Money covers itemized individual contributions over $200 in the FEC cycles currently loaded — not a career total, and not small-dollar or unitemized receipts. Votes and ideology cover the 119th Congress.

Who funds Shri Thanedar

Largest itemized donors across their campaign committees
DonorLocationTotalGifts
Thanedar, ShriDetroit, MI$1,205,4003
Levy, EdwardBirmingham, MI$19,8006
Barai, BharatMunster, IN$7,3006
Taxak, NarendraWest Bloomfield, MI$6,6002
Bhutada, KiranSugar Land, TX$6,6002
Japra, RomeshFremont, CA$6,6002
Sarver, RobertParadise Valley, AZ$6,6001
Patel, DilipLexington, MA$6,6002
Kumar, SantoshSouth Barrington, IL$6,6002
Koppula, NarsimhaVienna, VA$6,6003
Gandhi, MilanSouthfield, MI$6,6003
Singh, PradeepNorthville, MI$6,6002
Singh, JaspreetElk Grove, CA$6,6002
Bhutada, RameshSugar Land, TX$6,6002
Crown, LesterChicago, IL$6,6002
Kapur, SusanWinchester, MA$6,6002
Bhatt, AshokSan Francisco, CA$6,6003
Patel, SnehalBaton Rouge, LA$6,5004
Kapur, RameshWinchester, MA$6,2003
Agarwal, AvadheshRolling Hills, CA$6,0002
Heir, NimratElk Grove, CA$5,0002
Kahlon, Mandeep SinghModesto, CA$5,0002
Rathi, VasantYorba Linda, CA$5,0002
Sake, MaheshCoppell, TX$5,0002
Patel, TrishaGolden Oak, FL$5,0002

Campaign committees: Shri for Congress

Where the money comes from

Inside MI versus everywhere else
63%
From MI · $1,411,189
37%
From outside MI · $836,630

Share of itemized receipts by the contributor state on each filing. A filing with no state recorded counts as outside MI, so the in-state share is a floor rather than an estimate. Out-of-state giving is ordinary and lawful; it is reported here because it is part of the public record and is not otherwise easy to see.

How Shri Thanedar votes

Most recent roll-call votes, 119th Congress

362 Nay · 270 Yea · 11 Not Voting · 1.7% missed

DateQuestionMeasureVoteResult
Jul 23, 2026On PassageHR8884NayPassed (232–188)
Jul 23, 2026On Agreeing to the ResolutionHCONRES89YeaPassed (214–208)
Jul 22, 2026On Agreeing to the ResolutionHCONRES113NayPassed (216–214)
Jul 22, 2026On PassageHR7008NayPassed (232–198)
Jul 22, 2026On Motion to RecommitHR7008YeaFailed (211–218)
Jul 22, 2026On PassageHR8800NayPassed (216–212)
Jul 22, 2026On Motion to RecommitHR8800YeaFailed (213–216)
Jul 22, 2026On Agreeing to the AmendmentHR8800NayFailed (175–254)
Jul 22, 2026On Agreeing to the AmendmentHR8800NayAgreed to (232–199)
Jul 22, 2026On Agreeing to the AmendmentHR8800NayFailed (207–224)
Jul 22, 2026On Agreeing to the AmendmentHR8800NayAgreed to (221–210)
Jul 21, 2026On PassageHR9770NayPassed (220–205)
Jul 21, 2026On PassageHR6955NayPassed (270–155)
Jul 21, 2026On Motion to RecommitHR6955YeaFailed (210–216)
Jul 21, 2026On Agreeing to the AmendmentHR8800NayFailed (214–216)

Voting position over time

Nokken-Poole first dimension, re-estimated each Congress
CongressScorePosition on the scale
119th-0.358
118th-0.351

Nokken-Poole scores are re-estimated for each Congress, so they can move as a member’s voting changes. They are derived from roll-call votes alone and say nothing about why a member voted as they did. Voteview, which publishes these scores, reads the first dimension as running from liberal at −1 to conservative at +1; DonorTrail reports the position and the rank, and leaves the label to the source.

Reading this page

What these records do and do not show

This page places two independent public records side by side: itemized campaign contributions reported to the Federal Election Commission, and roll-call votes published by the Clerk of the House and the Secretary of the Senate. DonorTrail does not assert that any contribution influenced any vote, and nothing here should be read as a claim of cause. Here is the record; the conclusions are yours to draw.

Elsewhere: Wikidata · Congressional Biographical Directory · OpenSecrets · Ballotpedia

Money figures computed Aug 19, 2026. How the data works · Report a correction